Lately I've become aware of two schools of thought on blogging. One says it's just an overblown diary of
regurgitated diatribe while the other holds it up as the purest form of
writing. Funny thing is, there's merit
in both opinions determined entirely by whose stuff you happen to be reading.
The question I have to ask myself is: Does the value of the work depend on popular
opinion or the actual quality of the content?
Take the example of a textbook. It can be invaluable in teaching you a new
skill but you can be certain it will never make it to anyone's bestseller's
list. On the other hand, the most
popular book in the world still happens to be the Bible. The value of which is debatable depending on
whether you think it should be shelved in Fiction or Non-Fiction. I'm not touching that one...
The point is, nobody ever raved about their favorite
textbook. It's full of cold, boring
facts arranged in the most uninteresting and tedious manner possible. No fun.
If you're a Boomer
whose outgrown Harlequin Romance novels, however, "50 shades of grey"
is on par with Hemingway.
It's said that a good writer writes to their audience,
nothing more, nothing less. To do otherwise
dooms you to perpetual anonymity. So
it's not enough to "know thyself", we have to know everybody else
too.
Considering the literary company "50 Shades of
Grey" keeps, it's unlikely to end up on anyone's list of great classical
literature. E.L. James, however, knew
her audience and has found great success because of it.
But does 65 million copies sold worldwide make her work any
more relevant than the heartfelt musings found in a blog about the daily struggles
of single mom? What about the cancer researcher whose passion
to find a cure finds an outlet in her blog?
Is this work any less deserving of attention because it doesn't cater to
our lowest selves?
I found an article
recently about a formula used to determine the grade equivalency level of your
writing. It's said anything above the
8th grade reading level is difficult for most people to understand. Think about what you were reading in 8th
grade and the landscape looks pretty bleak.
It's suggested to "write down" to your readers.
So far, according to
the formula, this article's written at a 9th grade level by the way.
I think that's the wrong direction. It's offensive to me that instead of striving
to improve our comprehension we're encouraged to "dumb down" our
content. If it's true that knowledge is power then we should
be actively pursuing it not waiting for someone to package it for us.
And you know, sometimes, that's not fun...
And you know, sometimes, that's not fun...
Reality check, NOT EVERYTHING IN LIFE IS FUN!
It's the pursuit of our better selves that provides the
greatest reward. I'm not looking to talk
down to anyone, I just want to be able have an intelligent conversation. That anyone would suggest that you're not
entitled to be any smarter than the average 8th grader should be revolting to
you. Yet that's exactly the message
we're assaulted with every day.
We're a society that's become dependent on devices without
any concept of how they work. If they
break we just buy another. Even popular entertainment
is less about a good story than the spectacle.
Consider that if a television series like Star Trek, Bonanza or Perry
Mason were produced today as they were decades ago, they wouldn't have
lasted a season.
We now embrace a popular culture based almost entirely on image instead of talent. Let's get real here, Elvis could sing, Justin Bieber can't (and Lady Gaga is suspect too.)
We now embrace a popular culture based almost entirely on image instead of talent. Let's get real here, Elvis could sing, Justin Bieber can't (and Lady Gaga is suspect too.)
A generation ago economic status had a direct relationship
to the pursuit of knowledge. Our boomer
parents were encouraged to better themselves because a civilized society
depended on it. Whether or not your
education was formal its value was unquestioned. Now we step over PHD's who've taken up
residence in alleyways.
Which is why I find intensely offensive any formula that calls itself a "readability index calculator" that purports that good writing requires no participation from the reader.
Something's changed since I was in grade school because
that's 180 degrees from what I was taught.
It's not that I believe every reader should have a Master's degree but
if you don't understand something, look it up.
That's what Google is for! It's
called learning and painful as it may be you have no excuse not to know
something. Unfortunately for most, the
information is not always neatly packaged like some Android app so they just forget about it and try
to level up in Angry Birds.
It's amazing that the very thing that offers the best chance
for human advancement is the same thing that devalues all of us. Don't allow anyone to package your point of
view for you, the world has enough fundamentalist morons running around.
No comments:
Post a Comment