I told you I'd be watching and I'm keeping my promise. This time it's proof positive of the double standard TWIT employs when it comes to copyrighted material.
So why do I care?
As you know, My Digital Dynamic channel received a copyright strike due to a takedown of an UNEDITED vidcap of the broadcast of TWIT's move to the East Side studios. Even though I conformed to the strictest interpretation of the Creative Commons license I still received a copyright violation that removed monetization for all videos on that channel most of which had no TWIT content.
OK, so TWIT's on my list but what about YouTube? What do they have to do with it?
Everything.. There's a double standard at play here.
One that for me began years ago with the #microstopped mass takedown that yanked a Windows 8 HowTo video and continues with the recent TWIT takedowns of the past month. YouTube provides the heavy hand to enforce what is often unfair and unsubstantiated copyright claims.
The fact of the matter is this. YouTube is not your friend when it comes to copyright law and free speech. YouTube is in the business of selling ads not political activism. To that end they protect their Safe Harbor provisions and their advertising revenue at your expense.
It's a business not a public park. They get to make the rules and however unfair or unevenly applied you have to operate within them if you want to put your content on their service.
When they enforce the rules on one party and not another that sets up a double standard. This is why I include them in my "hypocrisy engine."
Here's the companion video. Much more fun than all these...words...