A non-sports fan's guide to Sunday's Super large Sportsball
Ubergame
I'm not much of a sports fan. In fact for many professional sports I only
have a passing interest in seeing their respective seasons end. That stems primarily from a desire to see the
end of the propaganda that accompanies said professional sports when their
season is over.
I don't hate sports, I just don't buy into the glorification of them. Hey, these guys get to play a game for a living. Yes it requires training, skill and intelligence to participate but in the end it's just a game. We should all be so lucky, but we aren't.
I don't hate sports, I just don't buy into the glorification of them. Hey, these guys get to play a game for a living. Yes it requires training, skill and intelligence to participate but in the end it's just a game. We should all be so lucky, but we aren't.
And so it was with Sunday's major sporting event which shall
remain unnamed because last year they sued a bunch of people just for saying its
name without permission from the council of elderly rich people who own it.
It had a lot to do with large men repeatedly assaulting each
other usually in pursuit of another large man in possession of an oblong shaped
object. Possession of said object is
paramount in this sporting contest by the way.
As I understand it, the game is divided into 4, 15 minute
quarters that for some reason take 3 hours to complete. There is also a lavish performance event in
the middle of it where they stop the game and a popular entertainer sings songs
with accompanying fanfare. After which
they resume the running and assaulting of each other.
(The 2014 version featured a matchup between a group of large individuals representing angry equines versus another group representing seafaring birds of prey.)
The 2013 version of the Super large Sportsball Ubergame took place on February 2nd and involved 2 teams. One team represented a group of black scavenging birds and the other a group of 19th century freelance laborers with pick axes.
During low spots during the game a small group of middle
aged men wearing headsets would have heated discussions about what just happened. It's not uncommon for discussions of 30
seconds of the game's proceedings to be discussed for 15 minutes, for example.
Some of these men could also be heard during play of the
game when something of interest to them occurs.
These men are known as Sportscasters.
They're much like the players in that they get paid to talk about professional
recreational events without having to take part. Some of their membership includes former game
players who have "retired" from participating in these professional
recreational activities.
For most of the game it appeared that the team representing
birds were very agitated while the team representing the laborers were largely
disinterested. Except during the early
part of the game after the popular entertainer was done singing or the "second
half" as they call it. Perhaps they were motivated by the performance of popular entertainer.
During an opportunity for the laborer team to best the bird
team's score, one of the playfield judges dressed in a prison shirt appeared to
have a lapse in their judgment. It seems
that the decision of the judge in the prison garb disheartened the laborer's team. The effect of which was for the laborer team
to stop trying to best the bird team's score. Apparently the effect of the popular entertainer's performance had worn off.
(For the 2014 game it appeared the team representing the angry equines shared the same motivational psychology as 2013's team representing laborers. Throughout the event the equine team's leader was shown many times with a concerned, unfulfilled demeanor. In the end the seafaring birds of prey triumphed over the angry equines by apparently just showing up. Proving once and for all after 2 examples that you never want to go up against a sportsball team representing angry birds. )
(For the 2014 game it appeared the team representing the angry equines shared the same motivational psychology as 2013's team representing laborers. Throughout the event the equine team's leader was shown many times with a concerned, unfulfilled demeanor. In the end the seafaring birds of prey triumphed over the angry equines by apparently just showing up. Proving once and for all after 2 examples that you never want to go up against a sportsball team representing angry birds. )
(During the weeks leading up to 2014 edition of this annual sports event many late night comedic hosting personalities made note of how both teams apparently heralded from areas of the country where the consumption of exotic flora was deemed acceptable. With some proclaiming the sporting event the "Bowl Bowl")
Now admittedly, I could care less and was actually flipping between coverage of this sporting event and reruns of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Still, I saw enough to know that my time was better spent on the reruns. Although even with my limited knowledge I surmised 30 minutes before the game ended that the birds were going to leave the laborer's with excrement on their pick axes.
Luckily, the Star Trek reruns were presented marathon
fashion by BBC America proving to be a far better use of the majority of my
time. I was also able to gain the most
minimal of knowledge so as not to bring harm to myself should devotees of this
sport find irritation with my lack of interest.
In short, I can fake it.
If you know the score and a few highlighted moments you can keep this
sport's devotees postulating on individual
player performance for days without fear of having to interject anything except
for the occasional head nod.
Mission accomplished.
This is the most entertaining description of a football game I have ever read. I'm sure there are many people out there who could relate to this article (if they are brave enough to admit it). You should send a copy of the article to Sports Illustrated!
ReplyDelete