After I wrote my last article about TWIT's latest round of
upheavals I found myself pondering why it was that I bothered to pay so much
attention to a tiny podcast network.
Others have wondered as well...
Hell, I even wonder at times but I think I have an
answer. So let this article serve as my explanation
to anyone that questions my motives.
Some might call the articles I write about TWIT as nothing
more than trolling hit pieces born from some beef I have with Leo Laporte.
And you would be wrong...
Trolls only seek to garner attention to
themselves at the expense of their
target.
I don't seek a target, I have a vested interest. One that may surprise you.
You see, I want TWIT to succeed.
Unlike the Revision 3
and 5 by 5's of the world, TWIT is not
just another podcast portal with prerecorded content waiting to be pulled off some
virtual bookshelf. It's a living,
breathing entity 24/7 that allows its viewers free access to not only relevant
content but a chance to peek behind the curtains of an emerging broadcast
medium.
Which is something most podcast aggregators don't do. There's no life to their offerings, just a
jukebox carousel of pre-packaged content.
TWIT was something different. It's the lovechild of Leo Laporte and TechTV
both of which I was an avid fan. Yes
there were reruns but there was also live programming and interactivity with
the hosts not to mention the opportunity to see what magic the Wizard (Laporte) was crafting behind the scenes.
This was the prototype for what Internet broadcasting should
be. Viewer driven, dynamic, interactive
and compelling.
It was the kind of programming that you could leave on all
day in the background if you wanted to.
No playlists, no stale overproduced content, no empty headed
"spokesmodels" that wouldn't know the difference between a smart
cache and a Smart car...
But beginning around the early part of 2012 just after the
move to TWIT's new studio, the Brick House, things started to change. There was an increasing emphasis on even long
running shows to be profitable.
While there's no denying that someone has to pay the bills the content began to suffer as ever more ads crept in and Laporte took a less central role. With no heir apparent to TWIT, leadership flounders and content frequently takes a back seat to the "business" of TWIT. All the time never realizing that the focus on ad revenue is killing the soul of the network.
While there's no denying that someone has to pay the bills the content began to suffer as ever more ads crept in and Laporte took a less central role. With no heir apparent to TWIT, leadership flounders and content frequently takes a back seat to the "business" of TWIT. All the time never realizing that the focus on ad revenue is killing the soul of the network.
So why do I care?
Because an opportunity is slipping away due to greed, hubris
and indifference. It's not so much about
Laporte, TWIT or even any of the shows so much as the impending failure of an
experiment that should otherwise succeed.
TWIT is the prototype for online media in a way that CNET
could only dream of being. It's the only
option poised to challenge traditional and new media outlets. If it fails it's unlikely that we'll see it's
kind again and frankly there's no good reason for it. The network continues to shoot itself in the
foot and become less relevant by the day as both talent and content migrate to
greener pastures. The only response, to
continue the slow slide into oblivion with denial and delusion.
TWIT is repeating the history of its ancestor in spite of
claims to the contrary. What began as
the offspring of TechTV is dangerously close to meeting the fate of G4.
I'd rather not write its epitaph.
That's why I care.
No comments :
Post a Comment