Stroll through YouTube for awhile and you're bound to be
offended by something. I've been told I'm
guilty of it myself as evidenced by the three videos YouTube has most recently
deemed "Not Advertiser Friendly."
As opposed to YouTube itself which is by and large "Not Partner
Friendly."
Personally I'd like to see a viable alternative to
YouTube as they've only become
increasingly Draconian since the Google acquisition.
Do these videos offend? That depends on your point of view. Do I advocate hate speech or present vile or disgusting content? Not as far as I'm concerned but your mileage may vary. I know I'm not the most attractive guy but I do keep my clothes on at least.
Do these videos offend? That depends on your point of view. Do I advocate hate speech or present vile or disgusting content? Not as far as I'm concerned but your mileage may vary. I know I'm not the most attractive guy but I do keep my clothes on at least.
Worse, if you're falsely accused of a copyright violation
(I've won 2 of those BTW) YouTube will deny you compensation but has no
compunction to place ads for their own benefit.
If the content is deemed questionable how can they justify
drawing revenue from it when you cannot?
It's corporatism at its worst.
It seems the rule of the Internet is that if it's convenient
it's going to cost you something. In
most cases it's free speech in others it's your privacy. See Facebook and Twitter for other examples.
The bulk of content on the service would safely fit onto a
third tier cable channel that runs infomercials between reruns of Cops all day. Most of those fail within a couple of years
so unless it's a money laundering operation it's not a viable business model. In that light how can YouTube defend
"Advertiser Friendly" denials of monetization?
Too bad, it could be so much more but YouTube chooses the
path of a coward and dies 1000 deaths every day with each new upload of a "Jackass" wannabe.
See how I get myself into trouble below...
Cheers!
No comments :
Post a Comment